For this edition of Article Outrage (inspired by a tip from the lovely Leandra), commentary is almost completely unnecessary.  Let’s keep it simple: just read these excerpts from Pond’s parent company, Unilever, when referring to international Pond’s products:

In 1987, Unilever purchased Chessebrough-Pond’s. By the 1990’s, Pond’s was at the forefront of leading-edge product innovations that answer women’s unmet skincare needs. Pond’s led colour management developments in Asia and pioneered the use of AHAs for anti-aging in the US. These innovations in tune with women’s needs and beauty ideals have given Pond’s a strong position in the global skin arena.

Hold on a minute…your claims to fame are “colour management” and anti-aging? That doesn’t sound like any unmet skincare needs I’ve ever had.  In fact, it kind of sounds like repressive bullshit.  Then again, I’m a 26-year-old white girl.  Let’s see what their Asian division, which is under the same parent company and based in the Philippines, has to say about those colour management developments…

The evolution of Pond’s is a true reflection of the modern asian woman, who is confident, vibrantly happy, and dynamic. And in keeping with the times, Pond’s provides products for all face care needs, in every stage of a woman’s life, and even love.

A company that promotes confidence and happiness at “every stage” of a woman’s life – now that sounds empowering.  But where does this love thing come in, Pond’s?

Pond’s now offers various platforms such as oil control and acne solution for young women on the cusp of romantic discovery; skin lightening for those in search of true love; as well as products that provide the best-proven anti-aging technology for those who wish to renew sparks and rekindle passions.

Wait just a fucking minute, here. Are you telling me, Pond’s, that your prize products - the ones that you market to a group of women using the words confident and vibrantly happy - are products that are intended to drastically alter the way they look?  And not only that, are you actually telling me that they need to do this to discover, capture and maintain love?  How stupid do you think we are…and how superficial do you think men are?

Here are the products Pond’s lists beneath the quotes above:

For those of you who aren’t seething with anger yet, I’ll make this abundantly clear: Pond’s effectively compares healthy dark skin and the natural process of aging to the hormonal imbalance that causes the painful bumps and scarring of acne. Not only that, but they’re saying that men will not love you if you have pimples, dark skin or wrinkles.

 

How many of you have pimples?

How many of you were born with dark skin?

How many of you plan on ever being old enough to have wrinkles?

 

If you’re not convinced, take a look at this March 2007 case study by Aneel Karnani for the University of Michigan: it lays out the negative social implications and lack of efficacy of Unilever’s “Fair & Lovely” skin lightening cream.  (My favorite part: Unilever claims that their ads “empower” women.  To do what?  Throw away their familial and racial heritage for the acceptance of a social construct that demoralizes women of color?)

See for yourself: below is a commercial (part one in a series) for Pond’s “White Beauty,” which runs in the exact same market and under the exact same premisse as “Fair & Lovely.”  (You can watch parts two through five on YouTube here.)

The products that Pond’s promotes for its “confident” female market are actually products that erode a woman’s confidence and depress her feelings of self-worth.

You know what will make me feel more confident?  Never buying a Pond’s product again.

[[Two quick notes: Skin lightening products have been in promoted in Afro-Caribbean, Asian and African markets for years, and activists have been fighting them for just as long.  Though Pond's US division doesn't sell these products, boycotting them does affect overall sales - they're owned by the same parent company.  Unilever also owns Dove, Vaseline, and other popular beauty brands. Check back soon to see how they're interconnected and whether more boycotts are prudent.]]

GD Star Rating
loading...

To contact Jennifer Nicole, the author of this post, please send e-mails to jen@thedemoiselles.com or use our contact form.



Subscribe to comments Comment | Trackback |
Post Tags: , , , , , , ,

Browse Timeline


Comments ( 30 )

[...] View post: Article Outrage: Boycott Pond's. Now. | The Demoiselles [...]

Article Outrage: Boycott Pond's. Now. | The Demoiselles | Lighter Skin Direct added these pithy words on Aug 12 09 at 12:11 pm

If you really want to complain, do it to unilever and not just ponds. Unilever owns ponds who makes skin bleaching creams for darker asians, and Dove which has that be beautiful in your own skin type campaign in the states. Boycott Unilever.
.-= thefatandskinny´s last blog ..I Love Le Sport Sac =-.

[Reply]

Jennifer Nicole Reply:

Because I haven’t hunted down all of the facts on each Unilever brand (and how their companies are related – corporate status can make a big difference in how profits are shared and companies are run) I didn’t want to make a blanket statement. Once I have more information I’ll definitely lay it out there…and start boycotting Unilever, if I find what I think I’ll find.

[Reply]

GD Star Rating
loading...

Brienna Reply:

They also own Axe, whose ads constantly objectify and dumb-down women.

[Reply]

Elle Reply:

We were JUST talking about this last night! You’re exactly right.

[Reply]

GD Star Rating
loading...
thefatandskinny added these pithy words on Aug 10 09 at 9:13 am

Wow, I’ve heard about these creams before and was aware of their existence, but the wording on those sites is just awful in the 21st Century!

I don’t use Ponds, but I do use Vaseline and Dove. I quite like Doves adverts, the “love the skin your in” ads present a good message I think, though I haven’t analysed them in detail!
.-= Retro Chick´s last blog ..What are you wearing? Whatever’s left…. =-.

[Reply]

Jennifer Nicole Reply:

Same here! There’s a lot of controversy surrounding those Dove ads (they are Photoshopped, though personally, I think no matter what one is trying to portray in advertising, there IS going to be Photoshopping) but I’ve always liked their platform. Now I’m not so sure…

[Reply]

GD Star Rating
loading...
Retro Chick added these pithy words on Aug 10 09 at 9:15 am

yup, i am sooo familiar with the ponds ‘fair and lovely’ commercials back home. i remember one in particular where a young girl who lives in this poor village has dreams of being famous and on tv and finally makes it and becomes a hot shot newscaster with the help of her fantastically fair and clear skin — all thanks to ponds, of course.

in asia, the paler and smoother your complexion, the more beautiful you are. the popularity of “skin whitening” products makes me sad.
.-= hanna´s last blog ..without fear: “that” dress. =-.

[Reply]

Jennifer Nicole Reply:

The issue is prevelant here in the US, too, though it’s not as openly marketed. How many of us have watched America’s Next Top Model (guilty pleasure!) and seen the black girls lament their dark skin in the casting episodes? That was the first time I realized it – when Monique of Cycle 7 cried because her darker-than-her-friends skin was made fun of.

[Reply]

GD Star Rating
loading...
hanna added these pithy words on Aug 10 09 at 9:51 am

I dont’ use Unilever products because they still do animal testing. Obviously they are not woman friendly either.

[Reply]

Elle Reply:

Ugh! Animal testing!? What YEAR is it???

Thanks for the additional info on Ponds. Even more reason to stop using them!

[Reply]

GD Star Rating
loading...
Princess Poochie added these pithy words on Aug 10 09 at 9:59 am

Skin whitening products are a big deal in Asia; I don’t see where Ponds is being particularly special or blazing any new trails here. And how is this all that more offensive than any anti-aging material? It’s just written in the marketing idiom of the the area it was written for. It would be totally unacceptable in the US… and voila, they don’t sell it that way here. I mean, I think whitening is BS too, I’m just not seeings where Ponds/Unilever is all that worthy of my outrage.

Plus, I kind of doubt boycotting US Ponds would do anything about their Asian strategies. If I were a Ponds exec, I’d probably just close the US branch to focus on making more popular whitening products for Asia.

[Reply]

Jennifer Nicole Reply:

Because Pond’s Asian and US divisions are owned by the same parent company, a boycott does lower their profit margins. If that causes a necessary closure of their US division, it will inevitably mean less profits for Pond’s. Sounds good to me.

Whether or not Pond’s is blazing a new trail with skin whitening products, they are on the trail. Who started the process, or markets the most negatively, or sells in which countries isn’t the issue here – the issue is that these products are part of an underlying stereotype that should be fought. Pond’s may not be the first to sell these products, but that doesn’t mean they deserve any more of my money than the first people to prey on these stereotypes.

Lastly, I don’t think that these products are any more offensive than anti-aging products, but I do think that telling people that Pond’s actively markets both as their biggest sellers (even though studies have proven that neither actually works worth a damn) is more likely to make people take notice. And isn’t that what we want – for people to take notice?

[Reply]

GD Star Rating
loading...

Elle Reply:

Honestly, honey – and I mean no offense by this – that outlook is exactly the apathetic attitude that WON’T change anything.

Just because they’re not the first doesn’t mean it’s okay.

Just because “it’s just marketing” doesn’t mean it’s okay.

You have to pull your mind out of the “marketing is just marketing” perception and look at how people are being effected by these tactics. That is what we’re after here and, yes, WE WILL nitpick each and every company who does something wrong.

Why?

Because IT’S STILL NOT OKAY. You’re only being a LITTLE racist? You’re only being a SLIGHT misogynist? You’re not the FIRST to degrade women in your ads?

No, it’s not okay and yes, we will write about all of them. And YES. It IS outrageous.

[Reply]

GD Star Rating
loading...
jfount added these pithy words on Aug 10 09 at 10:31 am

I wish more people were informed buyers. I know they’re filling a desire in their markets, but the way it’s being done?

It’s offensive, period.
.-= Jaime´s last blog ..Gilt Fuse Preview =-.

[Reply]

GD Star Rating
loading...
Jaime added these pithy words on Aug 10 09 at 10:58 am

RT @TheDemoiselles Article Outrage: Boycott Pond’s. Now. | The Demoiselles http://tinyurl.com/ktjutu

[Reply]

GD Star Rating
loading...
Gemma Seager added these pithy words on Aug 10 09 at 2:18 pm

Keeping them coming…a new "Article Outrage" on @TheDemoiselles: Boycott Pond’s. Now. http://tinyurl.com/ktjutu

[Reply]

GD Star Rating
loading...
Jen added these pithy words on Aug 10 09 at 3:34 pm

Speaking of Unilever, Dove is also a Unilever product, and so is Axe. They suck.

[Reply]

GD Star Rating
loading...
anardana added these pithy words on Aug 10 09 at 3:52 pm

I already have a bone to pick with Unilever. They also parent Axe, which is a men’s body wash/products company. Their ads are despicable and constantly place women in an inferior position to men. I wrote a paper on this recently.

But here is a good youtube video:

[Reply]

Elle Reply:

Thank you, Brienna!!

[Reply]

GD Star Rating
loading...
Brienna added these pithy words on Aug 10 09 at 4:24 pm

I dont think I need Ponds to find true lve, wtf??

[Reply]

GD Star Rating
loading...
eyeliah added these pithy words on Aug 10 09 at 6:40 pm

RT @craftyasparagus: What do you think of Ponds anti-aging & skin whitening products? Join the discussion! http://is.gd/2aUXL

[Reply]

GD Star Rating
loading...
Gemma Seager added these pithy words on Aug 10 09 at 10:09 pm

Wow. Just wow. Well, I have a Ponds cream that my mother bought for me, but I will be throwing that out tonight. Seriously, there were so many wrongs in that commercial, I don’t even know what to say. Thanks for bringing this issue to light. As a brown-skinned lady, Ponds with their “color management” system, I don’t think Ponds needs my .02 anymore.
.-= Sheena´s last blog ..Interview: Patricia Valery of Evil Needles =-.

[Reply]

GD Star Rating
loading...
Sheena added these pithy words on Aug 11 09 at 3:48 pm

I know, this features the Indian actress Priyanka Chopra. Racism based on skin color is very rampant in India, unfortunately. There is also a lot of Men’s Fairness cream ads here. Now it’s not just limited to women :(
.-= Freya´s last blog ..Giantess Lingerie and other stories =-.

[Reply]

GD Star Rating
loading...
Freya added these pithy words on Aug 12 09 at 4:42 am

RT @TheDemoiselles Article Outrage: Boycott Pond’s. Now. | The Demoiselles http://tinyurl.com/ktjutu <–OUTRAGE!

[Reply]

GD Star Rating
loading...
Gayle Hodgins added these pithy words on Aug 15 09 at 11:55 am

I think you guys should stop trying to pick a fight with everything. Advertisements are advertisements; who honestly and truly believes that crap? There are people who like those products because they like what those products do, not because they’re insecure or afraid they won’t find true love. Maybe they just like the appearance of less wrinkles or brighter skin. I mean, what are beauty/health companies supposed to say to sell their products, then? “Hey, we have some anti-wrinkle cream, which you don’t need because you are beautiful, wrinkles and all, and shouldn’t try to change your appearance just because you think having less wrinkles would be more visually appealing! But just in case you want to buy a product that you shouldn’t use because it would mean conforming to unrealistic standards, we have some for sale!”

Seriously. Trying to make a big deal out of something like this is just stupid. Stop wasting your time.

[Reply]

Elle Reply:

It’s not the “what” it’s the “why”, Scarlett. You’re looking at the nucleus of the problem from inside the cell. The view from outside of the cell (what I like to refer to as “the bigger picture”) consists of companies painting unrealistic depictions of societal standards & beauty (um, how realistic is the idea of “no wrinkles!” – it’s called aging) and then creating “fixes” for women to purchase (cha-ching) and thusly feed into the crappy picture of “beauty” that they’ve painted for you.

And no, it’s not okay. We’re not “picking fights”, we’re reacting. It’s something I wish more people would do.

Thanks for your thoughts! :)

[Reply]

GD Star Rating
loading...
Scarlett added these pithy words on Sep 14 09 at 9:02 pm

Scarlett: There are companies that do it right, and still make a killing. For one, check out our post about Benefit Cosmetics (among others).
.-= Jennifer Nicole´s last blog ..sarah huth: take two =-.

[Reply]

GD Star Rating
loading...
Jennifer Nicole added these pithy words on Sep 14 09 at 9:09 pm

unfortunately all companies that sell in asia have products that promote the asian social ideal of fair white blemish free skin at the expense of people who absolutely do not fit into that category because of genetics or ethnicity. In China, you never see celebrities that belong to an ethnic minority, and if they do they are never dark or even slightly tanned. ALL cosmetic companies will eventually have products that are aimed at whitenning the skin rather than evening the tone.

[Reply]

Jennifer Nicole Reply:

By that point, I’ll probably have resorted to smearing mud on my face and waiving a cardboard sign on the street about how the end is near.

These cosmetic companies drive me that crazy.

[Reply]

GD Star Rating
loading...
vdan added these pithy words on Nov 10 09 at 4:46 pm

Add a Comment


XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

*

CommentLuv badge







TheDemoiselles.com is a Less Than Four Media project.
© Copyright 2009 - 2011The Demoiselles. Thanks for visiting!